Let them talk man, the community continues to grow stronger. Whether they are commenting positively or negatively, what matters is that we support the project.

$Jager
Jager cannot be classified as a Ponzi scheme because:
It relies on a transparent and decentralized smart contract.
It is based on actual liquidity and burning, not on the inflow of new entrants' funds.
All transactions can be verified instantly on the blockchain.
It does not make unrealistic promises of fixed returns.
It does not rely on recruitment or a hierarchical system.
Thus, describing Jager as a Ponzi is entirely incorrect, and it is merely an emotional claim far from the technical and economic reality of the project.

{alpha}(560x74836cc0e821a6be18e407e6388e430b689c66e9)