You don't understand anything about the Ponzi scheme, Jager, and what currency is!

A growing number of investors are raising red flags over the cryptocurrency project $Jager , which is being marketed as a “deflationary gem” with a supposedly innovative tax model. Critics argue that the token’s design is essentially a Ponzi structure that depends on continuous inflows of new buyers to sustain itself.
How the Model Works
The token applies a 6% tax on both buys and sells. A portion of these fees is directed toward liquidity, while another portion is redistributed to existing holders. On the surface, this appears to reward long-term participants and strengthen market stability. However, in practice, the system functions only as long as new buyers continue entering the market.
The Real Mechanics Behind the Hype
According to critics, the model ultimately transfers wealth from latecomers to early participants and large holders. New investors are effectively paying a premium just to push the price higher. Meanwhile, whales accumulate during periods of retail enthusiasm and then exit profitably, leaving smaller investors with significant losses.
The structure means that smaller participants lose twice: first on the buy tax, and again on the sell tax. Marketing phrases such as “burns,” “passive rewards,” and “hold to earn” are seen by detractors as misleading, since they obscure the fact that the token’s sustainability depends on a continuous stream of new entrants.
Conclusion
Rather than innovation, critics argue that $Jager’s 6% entry and exit fees simply recycle wealth among participants until demand dries up, at which point the last wave of buyers is left holding the losses. The warnings highlight the importance of investor caution and due diligence when evaluating projects that rely heavily on redistribution mechanics and tax-based incentives.
$Jager