《Why is Sign's $12 million buyback more noteworthy than most financing?》

After hearing too much financing news, why not take a look at Sign's 'anti-pattern': while others are busy raising money, it is busy spending money—$12 million to buy back $SIGN , and this money was earned by itself (2024 revenue of $15 million), @Sign Official this move is much more substantial than many 'pie-in-the-sky financing'.

Its confidence comes from 'real implementation'. Sign Protocol is no longer just a 'paper agreement': people in Sierra Leone use its system for identity verification, Thai merchants rely on it for asset rights confirmation, these national-level projects are not 'pilots', but real infrastructure that generates continuous income. TokenTable is the same, project parties no longer need to write code to issue tokens, airdrops and unlocks are all managed by it, making it so practical that it has become an 'essential tool', leading to a natural high willingness to pay from users.

This buyback move, @Sign Official is very 'market-savvy'. Buying $8 million worth on the open market for 1.17 billion $SIGN directly reduces circulation, increasing scarcity; $4 million privately negotiated with large holders to avoid crashing the market and stabilize prices. Compared to projects that just 'lay flat' after raising funds, Sign's use of profits for buybacks genuinely puts 'protecting holders' at the forefront.

Now it is looking to expand to over 20 countries, and Binance Alpha allows for better trading of $SIGN . While earning steady income from real projects, it also uses buybacks to support token value. This 'double insurance' explains why capital has followed from Sequoia to YZi Labs. #Sign大展橙图 , perhaps in the future when assessing a project's value, one should first see if it dares to use its own money for buybacks.