《From National Projects to Token Buybacks, Where Does Sign's 'Sure Win' Logic Lie?》

How rare are the words 'profit' in Web3? Just look at Sign — in 2024, it raked in $15 million in revenue and casually pulled out $12 million to buy back $SIGN . This kind of 'earning and generous' operation is unique in the infrastructure track.

The confidence of @Sign Official comes from the closed loop of 'hard infrastructure + soft services'. Sign Protocol first tackled the 'hard nuts': building a digital identity system for Sierra Leone and helping Thailand with ownership proof infrastructure. These national projects not only generated real revenue but also accumulated compliance endorsements — it’s important to know that the trust barrier of government-level cooperation is the 'ticket' that most Web3 projects cannot obtain. On the other hand, TokenTable targets the pain point: are project teams often troubled by 'unlocking and airdrops' of tokens? It directly standardizes the process with smart contracts, making it hassle-free and compliant, naturally becoming a hot commodity.

The $12 million buyback move was very shrewd for @Sign Official . Spending $8 million in the open market to buy $SIGN reduced circulation, making the tokens in the holders' hands more valuable; $4 million was privately settled, stabilizing large holders without causing market turbulence. The key question is 'where does the money come from' — it's not through financing 'blood transfusions' but from the project's own revenue, indicating that Sign's business model has been successfully validated, and the buyback is not a 'pie in the sky' but a genuinely sustainable action.

Now Binance Alpha has added fuel to $SIGN , along with expansion plans in over 20 countries, Sign’s scale is still growing. #Sign大展橙图 , while others are still relying on concepts to heat things up, it has already stabilized value with 'profit + buyback'. Who wouldn’t love such a 'sure win' project?