Have you noticed that the coins bought by big players are completely different from the 'get rich quick codes' you come across? After reading what I've said, you’ll understand, and next time you see a coin skyrocketing, you'll have some confidence!
The wallet password of institutional big players: a true hardcore guide for selecting tokens.
We chase trends and listen to gossip, our hearts racing with the candlestick charts, right? But those managing hundreds of millions? They’re as calm as selecting antiques in a museum, with standards so strict they can filter out 99% of the 'internet celebrity' coins in the crypto world!
First check if the 'ID card' is clean: compliance is the threshold!
Just being technically strong isn’t enough; the first thing big players look at is: can this coin get registered with the US authorities? Will it be summoned for 'tea' by the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) one day and face a downfall? Regulatory risks are the sword hanging over your head; if it's non-compliant, no matter how appealing, forget it!
Is the pool deep enough? Imagine using a basin to catch a waterfall? Splashing everywhere! Institutions can easily drop billions in, but if you choose a 'small pool' coin, just a gentle buy can send the price to the sky, and when you want to escape, you'll crash through the floor.
Therefore, the market cap must be large enough, and trading must be active! This way, big players can swim like whales in the ocean, entering and exiting quietly without making too many waves.
What coins do the big players love? Those that build bridges in the entire crypto world! Think of those underlying public chains, storage protocols, oracles, etc.—they are the concrete and steel of the whole ecosystem! Tokens that rely solely on speculation and have no practical use are of no interest to institutions.
Is the team anonymous? Has the code not been updated for months? Is the finance like a black box? What institutions want: clear audit reports, transparent team backgrounds, and frequent code updates on GitHub! The more transparent, the more reassuring. Playing mysterious? There’s probably something fishy!
Big players aren’t thinking about how much it will rise next month; they’re concerned about whether this thing will still exist in the next bull market, and whether it’s strong! Are there real users using it? Is there a stable developer community building it? Is the ecosystem growing healthily? Anything without sustainable self-sustaining capability is just a flash in the pan.
Having talked about the coins institutions like, let’s discuss the types of coins institutions absolutely dislike!
1. Pure meme coins: So what if dog meme pictures are popular? Big players: entertainment is fine, but investing real money? No way! That's absolutely not allowed.
2. Meme coins (ultra-low market cap + crazy volatility): A 50% rise and fall in a day? Exciting! But big players can't afford to play with their heart rates like this. (Easily manipulated, institutions find it dirty.)
3. 'Island' coins (non-mainstream chains + no ecosystem): Just a small broken chain, with no applications on it? Poor liquidity, extremely high risk, institutions won’t look at it!
4. 'Airdrop is the peak' coins: Airdrop hype fades after it's over? No follow-up development plan? Institutions: a typical rug pull, lacking value support, they look down on it!
So do you understand? Next time you see a coin suddenly take off, don’t just FOMO! First measure it with the 'ruler' of the big players: Is it compliant? Is the pool deep? Is it infrastructure? Is it transparent enough? Can it last? If it ticks none of those boxes? Then it’s likely just a retail frenzy while the big players watch from the shore!
This money is hot, so we need to be cautious! The crypto world is deep, swim with your brain!
