Folks, I've figured it out. The more they hype up this Bubblemaps coin, the more I doubt it—do you really think those colorful bubbles are more reliable than candlestick charts?
@Bubblemaps
Not long ago, I was hard-pressed by the community to use an invitation code, claiming this is an 'on-chain funding CT machine' that can see through the main force's tricks. I excitedly clicked on it, and good grief, the screen looked like a spilled paint palette, with red bubbles and blue bubbles jammed together, and the labeled 'fund inflow' and 'big holder sell-off' made me dizzy. It turns out that spending time studying this thing is not as practical as just looking at the trading volume directly?
What's more ridiculous is that last week, a coin marked as 'safe funds pool' was suddenly revealed to have its project team secretly transferring tokens. The bubble is still there, shining brightly in green. I complained in the community, and immediately got chased by a few 'die-hard fans', being told 'don't blindly criticize if you don't understand' and 'do you know what on-chain visualization means?', making it seem like I am illiterate in the crypto world just because I don't understand the bubble.
The price is also puzzling. There’s clearly no actual application landing, and it’s all relying on the concept of 'tool coin' to hold up, yet it still managed to rise a bit. To put it bluntly, this thing is just a fancy package for on-chain data, giving new leeks the illusion that 'I am doing in-depth analysis'. If we really want to talk about practicality, it's better to just look at the transaction records and check the wallet addresses—at least those numbers won't lie to you.
I advise you all not to be fooled by the three words 'visualization'. No matter how good-looking the bubbles are, the harvested leeks still need to be cut. If this coin doesn't figure out how to land, it will eventually meet the same fate as those flashy air coins.
