#solanavshyperliquid Here is the latest comparison between Hyperliquid (HYPE) and Solana (SOL):
---
1. Architecture & Ecosystem Focus
Solana is a high-performance, multi-purpose Layer-1 blockchain with high throughput and low costs, supporting DeFi, NFTs, gaming, and smart contracts.
Hyperliquid is built as a Layer-1 specifically for on-chain financial applications with a full order book, HyperBFT consensus (sub-second block time), and a focus on decentralized perpetual trading.
2. Performance, Volume & Revenue
Solana has a vast ecosystem with a large TVL and mature adoption.
Hyperliquid stands out in daily revenue: the last three months generated higher transaction fees than Ethereum and Solana—a significant achievement. In just one day, the platform recorded revenue of up to US$1.7 million.
3. Trading Infrastructure & Token Utility
Hyperliquid serves perpetuals and spot through an on-chain order book—unlike many DEXs that rely on AMM or off-chain order books.
The HYPE token is used for staking, fees, and governance—integrated with HyperEVM to facilitate the deployment of Ethereum-based smart contracts while providing access to the Hyperliquid order book.
4. Adoption, Scalability & Innovation
Solana continues to enhance its infrastructure—with roadmaps like Internet Capital Markets, Multiple Concurrent Leaders, and integration with MetaMask/PancakeSwap.
Hyperliquid has received high coverage: institutions like Hyperliquid Strategies Inc. (HSI) even purchased HYPE tokens in large quantities, totaling hundreds of millions of dollars, supporting long-term growth potential.
The platform is also responsive to technical incidents: for example, paying nearly US$2 million in compensation to users after an API disruption—demonstrating a high commitment to user trust.
5. Risks & Challenges
Some security and transparency issues have arisen with Hyperliquid: such as manipulation in the JELLY market, as well as concerns about liquidity and vault design.
