Today's big update from @KaitoAI has sparked my interest in the upcoming @anoma space in a few days. Why does prioritizing community lead to greater success?
space aroused a lot of interest, why is it more important to value the community to go further?

In mid-July, while most DeFi users were still struggling with various complex cross-chain operations
, Anoma quietly launched a disruptive testnet
experience. This isn't another boring technical demo, but a famous
is a 3D interactive world called "Intent Machine" where users can visually
observe how "intent" is generated, matched, and settled in a multi-chain environment

Behind this gamified design is Anoma's profound understanding of
the pain points of Crytpo user experience. The current blockchain interaction model
requires users to know the technical details of each step precisely, choosing which
chain, which contract to call, how much slippage to set, this "imperative"
interaction method keeps a large number of ordinary users away

Unlike most emerging L1s, Anoma adopts the "Resource
Plasma" startup strategy. Initially as an adapter for Ethereum and major L2s
exists, rather than an independent consensus network. This design reduces infrastructure
costs while avoiding the security issues of cold starts

Anoma's technology stack demonstrates a deep understanding of the modular blockchain trend
:

Celestia Integration: Leveraging its data availability layer to ensure the integrity of cross-chain transactions
EigenLayer Collaboration: Enhancing the trust of the solver network through re-staking security
Risc Zero Integration: Achieving high
efficient privacy computing

This "standing on the shoulders of giants" strategy enables Anoma to focus on
the core innovation of the intent-centric architecture, rather than duplicating infrastructure

The key to Anoma's success lies in building a healthy solver ecosystem
system. The current design adopts a "winner-takes-all" competition mechanism, while introducing
a reputation system and penalty mechanism to prevent malicious behavior

However, there is an interesting game theory problem here: how to balance solver
profitability with the optimal user experience? If solver competition is too
fierce, it may lead to meager profits, affecting participation; if competition is not
sufficient, users may not be able to obtain the optimal execution price

Anoma's solution is to allow specialized division of labor, with general solvers handling
simple intents, and vertical dedicated solvers focusing on complex optimizations in specific fields
optimization. This layered architecture is expected to form a stable economic model after scaling

As a new work by the @namada team, Anoma naturally possesses powerful
privacy protection capabilities. Through Multi-Asset Shielded Pool (MASP), users can
enjoy cross-chain composability while maintaining transaction privacy

This design solves the liquidity island problem faced by current privacy coins. Traditionally
privacy coins often sacrifice composability for privacy, while Anoma
through intent layer abstraction, makes privacy protection a default option rather than an additional cost

From a valuation perspective, Anoma's $60.25 million total funding and approximately $2.6-
300 million valuation is relatively conservative. In contrast, Celestia's Series
B valuation reached $1 billion, showing the market's different expectations for different technology routes
expectations

This valuation difference reflects the market's cautious attitude towards the commercial
prospects of the intent-centric architecture. After all, changing user behavior habits is more than just technology
innovation is more challenging. But on the other hand, this also means that if Anoma
can successfully validate its value proposition, the potential growth space will be very considerable

According to the roadmap, Anoma plans to launch the mainnet in Q4 2025
Alpha version. The choice of this time point is quite strategic, both to catch up with
the start of the next market cycle, and to have enough time to verify and
optimize the core mechanisms in the testnet

The current testnet has demonstrated an impressive user experience, but
the real test will come when the mainnet faces the pressure of real funds and high-frequency transactions
pressure. Can the Solver network maintain high
efficiency? Can cross-chain atomic settlement handle large-scale concurrency? The answers to these questions
will determine whether Anoma can deliver on its ambitious vision

The intent-centric paradigm represented by Anoma is expected to become an important direction for the evolution of Crypto infrastructure
infrastructure evolution. By abstracting complex technical details,
Anoma clears user experience obstacles for the large-scale application of Crypto

Of course, revolutionary technological innovation is often accompanied by huge execution risks
Anoma needs to maintain its technological leadership while building a sustainable
sustainable solver ecosystem and finding the right balance between privacy and transparency
point

In any case, Anoma's exploration provides valuable experimentation for the entire industry
samples. Even if it is not the ultimate winner, its intent-centric design
ideas will profoundly affect the future development trajectory of Crypto. In this
In this sense, Anoma is already half successful