WoofShark小汪鯊鯊
--
WalletConnect vs MetaMask: Which wallet is more suitable for you?
And let me tell you, if you play DeFi or Web3 applications, MetaMask should be familiar to you. It is currently one of the most popular browser extension wallets, with a simple and intuitive interface, and decent security. As long as your browser is open, you can directly interact with various Ethereum ecosystem dApps. However, its drawbacks are quite obvious — it can only be used in a browser, making it less convenient on mobile devices.
On the other hand, @WalletConnect ($WCT ) works differently. It is not a wallet, but rather an application similar to a 'bridge' that allows you to connect your mobile wallet to various dApp platforms. The benefit is that you can directly review and approve transactions on your phone, which adds an extra layer of security, effectively reducing the risk of theft or unauthorized actions. Moreover, using #WalletConnect does not require you to enter private keys or recovery phrases, making it more friendly against phishing attacks.
On the other hand, @WalletConnect ($WCT ) works differently. It is not a wallet, but rather an application similar to a 'bridge' that allows you to connect your mobile wallet to various dApp platforms. The benefit is that you can directly review and approve transactions on your phone, which adds an extra layer of security, effectively reducing the risk of theft or unauthorized actions. Moreover, using #WalletConnect does not require you to enter private keys or recovery phrases, making it more friendly against phishing attacks.
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
0
0