#Bubblemaps Potential Challenges and Competition
Data Barriers: Continuous optimization of address label accuracy is needed (e.g., distinguishing between CEX hot wallets vs. market makers).
Competitive Comparison:
Nansen: Focuses on on-chain labeling but lacks a dynamic relationship graph.
Chainalysis: Strong in compliance, weak in real-time community collaboration.
Token Model Risk: Need to ensure the practical demand for $BMT (e.g., essential demand for premium features) > speculative trading.
Summary: Why is it worth paying attention to?
Rigid Demand: Frequent DeFi scams → Creates demand for transparent on-chain analysis tools.
Model Innovation: Community surveys + token incentives build a sustainable on-chain intelligence network.
Value Capture: $BMT embedded in core functionalities (data subscription/compliance/trading), forming a closed-loop economy.
🔍 Points to Ponder: If Bubblemaps collaborates with Tornado Cash monitoring agencies, the valuation of its compliance use case may rise quickly — this is precisely the potential explosion factor for $BMT. @Bubblemaps.io