追梦人 蓝鸟会
--
New Paradigm of Node Profitability: In the Lagrange Network, Integrity is More Important than Computing Power
In many blockchain networks, node profitability often relies on 'competing in computing power' and 'hardware superiority', leaving little opportunity for small players. However, the ZK proof network of Lagrange #Lagrange is fundamentally different: here, nodes rely on 'integrity' and 'technical strength' to establish themselves, and by staking $LA , they can participate and earn 'service fees' from real business.
Specifically, Lagrange nodes are primarily responsible for 'generating ZK proofs'. When developers need to verify cross-chain data, handle privacy transactions, or implement AI reasoning on-chain, they will publish tasks on the network. Nodes that stake $LA can participate in bidding; the faster and more accurately they generate proofs, the more likely they are to win orders and earn fees. More importantly, the network has a strict 'incentive and punishment mechanism': honest nodes that complete tasks on time and with high quality will have their rewards doubled; if they are lazy or commit fraud, their staked LA will be deducted (slashed), resulting in direct asset loss.
This mechanism makes the node ecosystem healthier: it abandons 'computing power monopoly' and advocates 'those who are reliable make money'. Even small teams, as long as they have strong technology and can optimize proof generation speed, can seize orders from larger nodes. Additionally, the variety of task types is rich and diverse: from simple cross-chain state verification to complex zkML reasoning, nodes can choose based on their own expertise without needing to be 'well-rounded'.
For holders of $LA , this means more stable earnings—nodes earn actual fees paid by developers, rather than tokens issued by project parties. @Lagrange Official is proving this 'labor distribution' model: the decentralization of Web3 should not be dictated by 'large nodes', but rather by 'those who create value share the cake'. #lagrange may be redefining the rules of the 'node economy'.
@Lagrange Official #lagrange
In many blockchain networks, node profitability often relies on 'competing in computing power' and 'hardware superiority', leaving little opportunity for small players. However, the ZK proof network of Lagrange #Lagrange is fundamentally different: here, nodes rely on 'integrity' and 'technical strength' to establish themselves, and by staking $LA , they can participate and earn 'service fees' from real business.
Specifically, Lagrange nodes are primarily responsible for 'generating ZK proofs'. When developers need to verify cross-chain data, handle privacy transactions, or implement AI reasoning on-chain, they will publish tasks on the network. Nodes that stake $LA can participate in bidding; the faster and more accurately they generate proofs, the more likely they are to win orders and earn fees. More importantly, the network has a strict 'incentive and punishment mechanism': honest nodes that complete tasks on time and with high quality will have their rewards doubled; if they are lazy or commit fraud, their staked LA will be deducted (slashed), resulting in direct asset loss.
This mechanism makes the node ecosystem healthier: it abandons 'computing power monopoly' and advocates 'those who are reliable make money'. Even small teams, as long as they have strong technology and can optimize proof generation speed, can seize orders from larger nodes. Additionally, the variety of task types is rich and diverse: from simple cross-chain state verification to complex zkML reasoning, nodes can choose based on their own expertise without needing to be 'well-rounded'.
For holders of $LA , this means more stable earnings—nodes earn actual fees paid by developers, rather than tokens issued by project parties. @Lagrange Official is proving this 'labor distribution' model: the decentralization of Web3 should not be dictated by 'large nodes', but rather by 'those who create value share the cake'. #lagrange may be redefining the rules of the 'node economy'.
@Lagrange Official #lagrange
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
6
0