1. Transparency and token not officially launched
Although the token $NAORIS is not yet 'live' and appears with low verification on sites like CoinRanking, it already raises doubts. Without clear data on supply or independent audits, any investor starts with quite a high risk due to a lack of transparency.
2. Latent regulatory risks
In the official terms, they warn that if authorities decide to classify Naoris Points, and by extension the token
NAORIS, as value tokens or securities, may face transfer restrictions that affect its liquidity and value.
This means that a regulatory decision could drastically change the project's landscape.
3. Complex tokenomics and limited adoption
The whitepaper describes a total supply of 500M tokens distributed among service payments, node incentives, development funds, team, and partnerships.
However, while it seems reasonable on paper, there is no clear evidence of high liquidity or real market demand. Distribution may be fair, but if firm adoption does not emerge, the token may not take off.
4. Ambitious technology, but little tested
The technical approach includes post-quantum cryptography according to NIST/NATO standards, dPoSec consensus, distributed AI (Swarm AI), and a 'Sub-Zero' layer that installs under existing blockchains.
Although everything sounds futuristic, it is a lot of technology together without a history of real functioning or external audits that demonstrate its robustness.
5. Disappointing usability
User comments on Reddit mentioned that the testnet installation process was **'so confusing and unfriendly'**.
For a project that requires connecting to multiple devices, opening extensions, or nodes, if the initial experience frustrates testers, greater institutional or mass adoption will be difficult.
6. Community alert that recalls scam schemes
In forums like Reddit, there are already warnings about tokens that arrive unexpectedly in wallets, considered scams and dangerous to interact with.
Although there is no evidence that NAORIS is a formal scam, it shares typical patterns of aggressive airdrops, referral codes, and initial shards that raise suspicions.
7. Competition with already established providers
Although Naoris promises automated decentralized security, companies like CertiK and OpenZeppelin are consolidating solutions with reliable audits—some even already integrated into popular EVM chains.
The technical and commercial challenge of competing with them and proving reliable real use is quite large.
🔍 Comparative risk chart
Risk Brief description
Poor transparency Unaudited token, uncertain supply
Uncertain regulation Possible reclassification as security
Limited liquidity & demand Recent token launch, no market proof
Untested technology Complex systems without public validation
Difficult installation Confusing experience for common users
Spam/testnet patterns Many referrals and unexpected tokens
More established competitors On-chain security already available
🧠 In summary
Naoris Protocol bets on an innovative vision: to build a decentralized cybersecurity infrastructure resistant to quantum computing. Its architecture includes post-quantum encryption, dPoSec consensus, and detection by distributed AI — elements that could theoretically make a difference.
However, the risk point lies in its current state:
The token is not clearly operating or audited;
It could face serious regulatory hurdles;
There is no evidence of significant institutional or corporate adoption;
The technology is very complex and still little verifiable;
The experience for early users was confusing and unfriendly;
Its promotion is based on referrals and testnet, without safety nets or organic growth;
Established competitors already offer continuous and automated auditing.
✅ Conclusion
From a prudent investment perspective or technological analysis, NAORIS presents itself as a very high-risk project, at least for now. The combination of a lack of real adoption, uncertain regulation, unverified tokenization, and technical complexity without backing makes it better for many to wait for it to mature or validate its effectiveness before considering any investment.
