Whether it's ETH or other altcoins, which one has a big pie that makes people feel comfortable? Those who go long are always making money; buying spot and contracts won't disappoint you.
But can the spot be utilized now? Yes, brother.
The crypto market has developed for over a decade, and BTC, as the core asset, often remains in a 'non-mainstream utilization state' — it has the highest total market value, yet the proportion participating in income products is relatively low. BounceBit does not attempt to subvert anything, but through a structure that runs parallel technology and regulation, it has practically opened up a 'value-added channel' for BTC.
Combining CeFi and DeFi is not just talk.
BounceBit's architecture is not the type that claims innovation without understanding it. Its core lies in a three-part structure of custody + mirroring + on-chain operations:
1. Users' BTC is custodied under the MirrorX system by Ceffu;
2. Corresponding on-chain certificates are generated and run on the BounceBit chain;
3. Users can participate in various income products, from simple staking to complex arbitrage.
This is not to bypass decentralization, but to provide users with a verifiable, secure, and controllable income entry.
Unlike many platforms that only offer a single APY indicator, BounceBit's product logic is layered service.
Ordinary users can choose the automatic compound interest pool, just like using a mutual fund for wealth management, and can steadily increase value without operations.
Advanced users can participate in arbitrage strategies, operated by a professional team managing capital rate differences, pursuing lower risk and more stable returns.
And those liquidity entrances connected with CEX are not just about 'diverting traffic,' but about bringing mainstream funds into the DeFi framework, forming a compliant and transparent asset closed loop.
What has been technically solved?
Many DeFi protocols face a common problem: fragmented multi-chain liquidity. BounceBit introduces LayerZero technology to build a 'fully chain-compatible framework,' which not only unifies account management but also allows BTC anchor assets on different chains to participate in the same strategy system. This is fundamentally helpful for cross-chain arbitrage and asset aggregation.
How should investors view this?
For traditional BTC holders, if you are unwilling to trade frequently, don't want to use leverage, and also don't want to take on futures risk, then this 'compliance + on-chain' model is very suitable. Compared to ETH's re-staking track, the gap in the BTC track is larger, and there are more opportunities.
Custodial dependence is always a trade-off; complete self-custody cannot be achieved in this model. But it is this moderated 'centralization' that allows institutions and ordinary users to find entry points.
