Why do institutions collectively choose #BounceBit ? The underlying logic behind trust
When traditional financial giants like #BlackRock and Franklin Templeton decide to embrace crypto, their only criterion is: is it sufficiently 'safe, compliant, and transparent'? #BounceBit can become a partner for these institutions precisely because it has ingrained these three words into the ecological foundation.
First, let's look at the 'compliance closed loop': from asset custody to transaction execution, everything stays within the regulatory red line. BTC is jointly held by the licensed institution CEFFU and the main network digital, complying with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and KYC rules; the issuance, trading, and clearing of tokenized treasury bonds are all completed through Coinbase INTX (a compliant exchange), with regulatory records at every step, so institutions don't have to worry about 'stepping on a landmine'.
Next, let's consider 'transparency': the underlying holdings of all RWA assets (such as the codes and maturity dates of treasury bonds held) are traceable on-chain, and every transaction of the crypto strategy (the order time and price on Coinbase) is publicly transparent. A family fund has allocated 50 million USD in treasury bonds through #BounceBit , and can view the holding details in real-time on-chain, completely matching the experience of offline purchases, but with the added convenience of on-chain transactions.
This 'institutional-level trust' also benefits ordinary users: by staking $BB , retail investors can participate in these high-threshold businesses and share the trading profits of institutional clients. For example, the fees generated by BlackRock's tokenized products will be proportionally distributed to $BB holders, breaking the old pattern of 'institutions making big money while retail investors get scraps'. @BounceBit is proving that the integration of crypto and traditional finance is not about one side disrupting the other, but rather making money together based on trust.
