There has been a lot of controversy over the Boundless task system in the past couple of days.
Let me clarify my stance—do it, do multiple accounts, do it to the end.
Currently, it seems there will be a request verification task once a week, totaling about 40u for four times, which is not an unacceptable cost compared to expectations for a single account.
However, blindly following this, spending money for verification as a threshold is acceptable, but if additional ways to spend money to buy ranks are introduced, and users are coerced into paying under various pretenses to the point where it becomes paying for qualifications, then we need to reassess.
It is crucial to distinguish between requiring users to prove themselves with a threshold and directly taking money from users.
So far, although there are many bugs and the technology is somewhat lacking, the nested structure design of the tasks is relatively good, protecting the leading advantage of the earliest and most decisive participants to some extent.
The main issue is that scoring based on voting results is a very nonsensical design; such inexplicable factors affecting the key scores for ranking up are quite stupid.
In summary, it is not yet at a level that warrants a wholesale rejection; there are significant differences, but I still remain optimistic, so let's proceed.