There are many people who get promiscuous after drinking, but almost no one transfers money after drinking; many hit their wives after drinking, but almost no one hits their bosses. People actually create emotions for a purpose, rather than emotions creating behavior.
If alcohol is the reason for "promiscuity," then why isn't it the reason for "transferring money"? Is a password really harder to unlock than a belt? If anger is the reason for "hitting people," then how does it so intelligently recognize the faces of a wife and a boss, and then choose to explode selectively? Does anger come with a facial recognition system and risk assessment software? At this point, the theory of causation breaks down. It doesn't make sense. A single "cause" (like alcohol) cannot produce such vastly different "results." Unless... unless this so-called "cause" is not the real boss at all. It is at best a temporary worker, a facade we hire to act, a stage backdrop temporarily set up to achieve some hidden purpose.
