After researching the Binance Mindshare leaderboard, I found that there are still quite a few issues.
1️⃣
Is the reference factor for the leaderboard too singular?
Currently, the leaderboard significantly references the factor of influence, with Masked Guy basically dominating the rankings!
I think it’s fine to have Masked Guy in the overall rankings; he is the number one in the Chinese-speaking community;
But the problem is that Masked Guy doesn’t even mention the project parties like @humafinance in his content, and it doesn’t even comply with the participation rules in the backend. Can he really make it to the leaderboard and become number one?
And do Masked Guy and the others really care about being on these rankings?
2️⃣
Is it necessary to distinguish between individual creators and team creators in the audience of the leaderboard?
Currently, the second place on the leaderboard seems to be similar to foreign media-type creators in the crypto space, and there are also entities like Benpaocai, who openly state that they are crypto media.
This feedback should still be relayed to the relevant personnel at Binance; otherwise, it might actually discourage ordinary users from participating actively. @sisibinance
#创作者任务台