#《Coprocessor tasks are not meant to be templated》
I see too many posts talking about Coprocessor,
but how many people actually know how to implement it?
What is off-chain execution? How does it work with the prover?
Ask and they play dead.
You treat Lagrange Coprocessor as a buzzword tool,
but in reality, this is the core for builders to expand off-chain capabilities.
It is not meant to pile up phrases like 'ZK is powerful'.
Those who truly know how to use it understand how to deploy, how to verify, how to minimize costs.
What about you? Only know how to talk narrative, ride on events, and post meme images randomly.
What we need are creators who understand technology, not narrative parasites.
Get it straight, this is not your KPI training ground; this is a protocol experimentation space.
If you still don't understand, just shut up. Lagrange doesn't lack noise.
#Lagrange
@lagrangedev
#《Stop using Lagrange as material for your hot air》
I see too many accounts posting over a dozen Lagrange articles every day,
talking about Coprocessor as if they know everything, yet they can't even tell what a prover or verifier is.
To put it bluntly, they haven't even opened Lagrange's GitHub.
They only know 'there's a reward', then start copy-pasting, using images to template, not even bothering to think.
The design of Coprocessor is a tool for builders to perform complex off-chain tasks,
such as AI reasoning, data queries, ZK proof generation,
yet you treat it as a 'new narrative template', generating a bunch of ineffective content every day.
You're not just pretending to understand, you're turning this experiment into a farce.
And we are the ones who want to stop this farce.
Because if this continues, the technology won't be seen, only the bubble will keep growing.
Wake up, Lagrange is a protocol, not a slogan.