#《Coprocessor is not a new term, it is the watershed of on-chain performance》
You may not understand Coprocessor, but you cannot pretend it doesn't exist.
Currently, there are many projects in the crypto space talking about ZK, DA, and making grand claims,
but the real computation efficiency that can be implemented still relies on the "off-chain computation + on-chain verification" model.
Why can Lagrange become a highlight in the ZK track?
Because it does not treat ZK as a narrative, but rather as the foundation of a product.
It uses the Coprocessor module to complete heavy computation tasks off-chain,
then generates proofs that are quickly verified by the Verifier on the main chain,
this is not just about saving time, it is solving the long-standing issue of L1 scalability.
Many people say ZK is hard to understand, I say ZK is hard to implement.
No matter how much you understand, it is more practical to have a framework that can be activated.
And this is precisely what makes Lagrange most convincing: it is not just talk, it is implementation.
Stop asking what the next narrative is,
first go study these mechanisms that are truly solving on-chain bottlenecks.