The Fifteenth Theory of Demystification: When in Doubt, Use Nested Solutions

This is something I realized recently while researching some projects. Nested solutions, as a neutral term, have become a huge pejorative in the Crypto industry.

Whether it's the project team hiding behind a facade, trying to inflate superficial yields, or wanting to tell a grand narrative, they can all use nested solutions to address their issues.

Previously, the LRT project team said, "Think LST yields are too low? Come to me, I'll give you an additional token yield. Still not enough? Then stake it with a neighboring competitor to get even more token yield!"

But what was the outcome? Users exchanged their real capital for various paper returns, while helplessly watching their money become visible yet inaccessible.

Later, project teams addressed various trust issues by saying, "Do you think the credibility of A's results is low? Then come here, I'll have B verify the results. Still not enough? Then I'll find C to co-verify..."

The actual result is that you originally only needed to trust A's results, but it evolved into needing to trust the verification results from B, C, and even D, E, F, etc. So did this actually increase the credibility of the results, or did it merely add various costs and complexities?

Can you guess which project this is from the Kaito leaderboard?