BRICS 🆚 NATO⚔️

Military Strength:

NATO's Edge: NATO has a more coordinated and advanced military strength, with a unified command structure, significantly larger defense budgets, and the ability to mobilize forces swiftly across continents.

Defense Spending: NATO members collectively spent over $1.3 trillion on defense in 2024, accounting for 55% of global military expenditure. The United States alone contributed $877 billion.

Nuclear Capabilities: NATO controls around 5,500 warheads, while BRICS has 6,360, with Russia's massive arsenal making up most of the difference ¹

Economic Power:

BRICS' Emergence : BRICS has surpassed NATO in combined GDP, reaching over $60 trillion, driven by China and India. China alone boasts a GDP of approximately $18 trillion.

Growth Rate: BRICS countries enjoy higher growth rates, with an average of 4%+ compared to NATO's 1-2.5%.

Trade Volume: BRICS has surged in intra-bloc trade, accounting for 25% of global exports ¹.

Key Differences:

NATO: A military alliance focused on collective defense, with 32 member countries and a primary focus on military might.

BRICS : An economic cooperation bloc focused on economic growth and multilateralism, with 10 member countries and a growing influence in global trade ¹.

In conclusion, while NATO maintains a clear edge in military strength, BRICS is rapidly gaining ground in economic power and influence. The future balance between these two blocs will likely shape the global order.#INDIANstock $BTC