Aspecta aims to build on-chain standards and trust mechanisms for 'illiquid assets.'

Written by: Alex Liu, Foresight News

On the evening of July 10, Yzi Labs announced a strategic investment in Aspecta. This article aims to briefly interpret Aspecta — which seeks to build on-chain standards and trust mechanisms for 'illiquid assets' in traditional capital markets, including the project's design logic, product system, application progress, and industry potential.

Team Background

Regarding the team background, Aspecta did not start from scratch. The project was incubated at Yale University's Tsai CITY (Tsai Center for Innovative Thinking at Yale) in 2022, and core team members come from top universities and research institutions including Yale, Tsinghua, Berkeley, and McGill, possessing multiple patents and publications in the fields of AI and graph learning. The co-founding team includes former Tinder chief scientist Steve Liu (Academician of the Canadian Academy of Engineering) as chief scientist, Jack He as co-founder, and the team also includes several senior engineers and growth leaders like Jane Yang.

Co-founder Jack He speaking at TreeHacks

Why Did It Arise? What Pain Points Does It Solve?

In traditional markets, a large number of assets such as early-stage equity, locked tokens, private equity, and real-world assets (RWA) cannot be traded in the public market, lacking transparent pricing, which severely restricts liquidity and pricing efficiency. Aspecta proposes: to give these 'closed assets' on-chain 'life,' achieving not only pricing but also providing trading capabilities, thereby reducing information asymmetry and enhancing asset utilization.

When analyzing this logic, one might imagine: a project locks a portion of its tokens in a Series A round and hesitates to exit immediately when the term ends due to a lack of liquidity and pricing mechanisms in the market. Aspecta enables these assets to be priced, traded, and tracked through a standardized 'packaging + reputation mechanism' — unlocking new value for them.

Two Core Products: BuildKey and Aspecta ID

The design context of Aspecta is clear, with its core divided into two mutually supportive paths:

BuildKey: Asset Standardization and Lifecycle Pricing

BuildKey presents illiquid assets in a tradable ERC-20-like credential format. For instance, pre-TGE equity, locked tokens, private placement rights, etc., can all be issued and traded on-chain through BuildKey. This mechanism not only supports various pricing methods such as AMM, order books, and auctions, but also allows assets to switch between different lifecycle stages, such as from venture capital to public trading markets in an 'on-chain relay.'

It is worth noting that since its launch, BuildKey has supported pricing for over 25 types of digital assets and completed over 50 million transactions, demonstrating a strong demand for on-chain liquidity mechanisms from closed capital. It is not simply token minting, but a system of 'lifecycle asset variants': users can freely enter and exit at multiple stages such as TGE, lock-up, and secondary markets, resulting in more continuous asset pricing.

Aspecta ID: AI-Driven Trusted Identity Protocol

If BuildKey is an asset credential tool, Aspecta ID is the trust mechanism that endorses issuers. It integrates data from GitHub submissions, on-chain behaviors, project contributions, etc., using AI algorithms to create credit profiles for developers, projects, and even asset issuers, issuing reputation scores.

This mechanism eliminates the 'trust vacuum' in asset packaging. When the project is in its early stages or in a closed phase, Aspecta ID's trust output can alleviate concerns for investors and traders. Currently, over 54,000 GitHub developers have completed verification, and the system is evolving from a trust protocol to community governance.

Product Interaction: How to Form a Closed Loop?

In Aspecta's architecture, BuildKey and Aspecta ID do not exist in isolation; rather, they work together seamlessly to construct a complete closed-loop ecosystem from asset generation to trust establishment and transaction circulation. For example, when developers submit code on GitHub and associate it with a project, their technical contributions and on-chain activities will be recognized, evaluated, and form a reputation profile by the Aspecta ID system. Based on this identity verification mechanism, projects have clear trust support when issuing illiquid assets like pre-TGE equity in subsequent rounds. These assets are then tokenized on-chain through BuildKey's mechanism, publicly sold, and complete initial price discovery while establishing transaction records.

With deeper community participation, the AMM, order book, and auction mechanisms supported by BuildKey gradually enhance the price transparency and trading depth of assets. Throughout this process, users flexibly decide whether to participate in subscriptions or exit investments based on the issuer's reputation rating and market pricing, allowing assets to form a complete lifecycle trajectory, accumulating verifiable transaction history and value feedback. This mechanism not only promotes price transparency for early assets but also achieves a positive cycle between trust mechanisms and liquidity: on one hand, Aspecta ID provides underlying credit anchoring for assets; on the other hand, on-chain transaction data continuously feeds back into the trust assessment system, making subsequent asset issuance more efficient and credible.

Community, Users, and Ecosystem

By mid-2025, Aspecta has attracted over 650,000 users to participate in platform usage, including more than 54,000 verified developers through GitHub, who play a crucial role in ecosystem building, further enhancing the practicality and appeal of the identity system. Meanwhile, BuildKey has supported the on-chain issuance and trading of over 25 types of illiquid assets, demonstrating the mechanism's broad adaptability to the market. The community's active participation has also accelerated the rapid implementation of mechanisms such as multi-chain compatibility, hybrid AMM, and order book models, expanding the overall ecosystem toward a more open and flexible direction.

From a practical perspective, Aspecta is building a triangular structure of 'AI + Assets + Community,' attempting to connect the entire process from identity recognition, asset packaging to on-chain governance and incentives, initially forming infrastructure-level network effects.

Conclusion

Aspecta is attempting to bridge the gap between traditional capital and Web3 using its own approach of 'trusted identity + lifecycle asset packaging + on-chain liquidity mechanisms.' From GitHub submissions to token certificates, from closed issuance to secondary market trading, its product system continues to self-consistently upgrade. Although still in its early stages, the over $50 million trading volume of BuildKey and the user base of over 650,000 provide a solid underlying foundation.