The attacker used CCTP to transfer 40 million USD worth of assets from Arbitrum to Ethereum, of which 9 million USDC related was not frozen within 1-2 hours.
This attack demonstrates a significant vulnerability in multi-chain asset management, as a substantial amount of money continues to circulate freely despite suspicious signs.
MAIN CONTENT
The attacker exploited CCTP to transfer money from Arbitrum to Ethereum.
40 million USD was affected, of which 9 million USDC was not frozen in time.
The issue of multi-chain asset management was exposed in this incident.
What method did the attacker use to transfer assets from Arbitrum to Ethereum?
Blockchain analyst ZachXBT confirms that the attacker used the Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) to move 40 million USD from the Arbitrum network to Ethereum.
Using CCTP allows hackers to quickly transfer multi-chain assets, making timely control and prevention difficult. This raises concerns about the safety of bridges between Layer 2 and Layer 1 networks.
What type of assets were affected in this attack?
Of the 40 million USD affected by the attack, approximately 9 million USDC was not frozen within 1-2 hours after being transferred to Ethereum.
USDC is a widely used Stablecoin and is often highly regarded for its safety; however, the incident shows that even reputable cryptocurrencies can be exploited if not strictly managed.
"The discovery of 9 million USDC not being frozen after the attack proves that the control and response system was not fast enough to protect assets on Cross-Chain bridges."
ZachXBT – On-chain analyst, July 2024
How does this incident affect investor trust in multi-chain solutions?
The incident has diminished investor trust in the multi-chain ecosystem, especially in cross-chain asset transfer methods due to high security risks.
Blockchain experts emphasize that improving monitoring and asset locking speed when detecting unusual behavior is a top priority to minimize future losses.
"The key to sustainable development in multi-chain technology is to build an alert system and immediate response for unusual transactions."
Mr. Nguyen Minh Tuan – CEO of Vietnam Blockchain Company, speaking at the 2024 Cryptocurrency Technology Conference
What important lessons can be learned from this attack?
First, multi-chain protocols need to enhance risk control capabilities and coordinate quickly in incident response.
Secondly, improving the mechanism for freezing cross-chain assets needs to be prioritized to protect users from fraudulent activities.
Finally, the project community and investors need to be more vigilant about technical vulnerabilities in bridging solutions and multi-chain token transfers.
What technological solutions are proposed to mitigate risks from multi-chain attacks?
Many developers are focusing on improving response speed in asset locking and enhancing Cross-Chain transaction monitoring capabilities.
Solutions such as multi-signature authentication, enhancing Smart Contract security, and AI applications for analyzing unusual transaction behavior are currently prominent trends.
Comparison of asset freezing speeds between current On-chain bridge systems
Bridge system Response time for locking assets Advantages Disadvantages CCTP (Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol) 1-2 hours delay Easy to transfer multi-chain assets Asset locking is not timely, creating security loopholes Wormhole A few minutes Fast response, integrates multiple blockchains Complex in testing and error handling LayerZero Fast, under 5 minutes Safer due to multi-layer authentication High operational costs
Frequently Asked Questions
What bridge did the attacker use to move assets? The attacker used CCTP to transfer 40 million USD from Arbitrum to Ethereum, according to expert analysis by ZachXBT. Why wasn't 9 million USDC frozen in time? The monitoring and response system was not fast enough to handle unusual transactions on the CCTP bridge. What do projects need to do to enhance multi-chain security? Upgrade response speed, apply multi-signature authentication, and use AI to detect unusual transaction behaviors. How does this incident affect investors? Are there other bridges that lock assets faster than CCTP? Yes, Wormhole and LayerZero respond faster, under 5 minutes, minimizing the risk of asset loss.
Source: https://tintucbitcoin.com/usdc-khong-bi-circle-phong-toa-token/
Thank you for reading this article!
Please Like, Comment, and Follow TinTucBitcoin to stay updated with the latest news about the cryptocurrency market and not miss any important information!
