Today#TON 's explosive rise has caught the market's attention; what is the reason behind it? Let's take a look together!
In recent years, project parties have been incessantly talking about 'staking', which has really exhausted everyone's patience: lock-up → no liquidity → APR drops to a 'pitiful annual rate', ultimately evolving into retail investors serving as liquidity while VCs exit at high positions. However, this time TON has turned 'staking' into real benefits—staking $100,000 in TON for three years can get you a 10-year golden visa in the UAE.
First, the rules can be summed up in three sentences.
Staking limit: $100,000 worth of TON, locked for 36 months through on-chain smart contracts.
Service fee: A one-time fee of $35,000, covering visa approval + identity verification.
Returns:
TON annualized at 3-4% continues to be issued;
Primary applicant + spouse + children + parents, the whole family gets 10 years of residency;
After three years, TON unlocks, and the funds return to liquidity.
Traditional golden visas require you to lock up $540,000 in real estate/fixed deposits, starting with a process of three to five months, and you can't cash out early. TON directly cuts costs to one-third, shortens the time to within seven weeks, while retaining currency-based liquidity, which is indeed much more attractive.
Secondly, is this a marketing scheme, or an industry turning point?
Firstly, TON itself is backed by Telegram, with a user base in place; previously, its price performance was mediocre, but this time throwing out the concept of 'token = residency rights' has suddenly created a buzz. On the day of the announcement, TON's price surged from $2.75 to $3.08, with a market cap increase of over $700 million, indicating that funds are buying in.
Moreover, behind this is the UAE's 'precise investment promotion' for crypto capital—bring your on-chain wealth, and I will give you identity convenience, tax advantages, and a Web3 regulatory framework; a win-win for the government, projects, and investors.
Finally, this matter extends 'tokenization of real rights' from real estate and government bonds to Residency-as-a-Token. Today it's the UAE golden visa, tomorrow who knows which entity might package our identity into an NFT for auction.
Thirdly, is it suitable to rush in? First, consider three risks.
Price volatility: 3-year lock-up, does TON have more than 90% retracement risk? You have to calculate your own heartbeat.
Policy gray area: The official website states 'UAE partner agency', not an official direct signature, there is a probability of intermediary disputes.
Opportunity cost: With the same $135,000, you could also invest in real estate, funds, and global multi-visa arrangements; staking is just one more option.
Bottom line thinking: Even if #TON really drops to zero, buying a 10-year golden visa for $100,000 is essentially the same as spending $540,000 on real estate with a 3-year lock-up, but with higher liquidity; however, if you have no plans to invest in the Middle East, this money could completely go into other assets.
Fourthly, conclusion.
Staking is no longer 'locking up for air votes', but can directly send you into Dubai's skyscrapers; residency rights are no longer just reliant on real estate or bonds, but may be written into smart contracts. When identity begins to go on-chain, the flow of global capital and talent may truly be rewritten.
Anyway, this matter has made me feel for the first time: it turns out that locking up can also secure the second key to life. As for whether to get on board? First, assess the risks and see if you can bear them. #Altcoins
That's it for the article! If you feel lost in the crypto world, consider collaborating with me to lay out strategies and harvest from the market makers!
