Core issue: Should the U.S. directly 'nationalize' companies like MicroStrategy MSTR that hoard Bitcoin and turn their Bitcoin into a national strategic reserve?
Expert opinions are polarized, with a lot of tension!
Pro side: Representative - Max Keiser, veteran crypto whistleblower.
Core reason: National security! Brother Keiser's imagination runs wild: Imagine if China and Russia suddenly buy 1 million Bitcoins at astronomical values, what would the U.S. do? Sit and wait?
Operational advice: Sell gold! Liquidate the gold in the national treasury at market price for cash.
Bear market bottom fishing! Wait for the Bitcoin bear market; when MSTR's stock price and the implied value of its Bitcoin holdings plummet...
Direct 'requisition'! Nationalizing companies like MSTR or Riot Blockchain under the guise of national security, reclaiming their Bitcoin reserves for the state!
Consequence prediction: Keiser warns that this could trigger a global 'hash war'! Countries will fight for Bitcoin hash power and reserves!
Con side: Representative - Lyn Alden, a powerful financial analyst.
Core reason: Property rights are sacred and inviolable! Sister Alden hits the nail on the head: If the government dares to blatantly seize a company, it’s like slapping itself in the face in front of global investors!
Severe consequences:
Investment confidence is crashing! Who would dare to invest in the U.S. anymore? If the government can seize Bitcoin companies today, they can seize any company tomorrow. Once this label is attached, it can't be removed for decades!
Economic foundations are shaking! The market economy and private property rights are the foundation of America's founding, playing this way is akin to self-destruction, a losing proposition!
What does Big D think?
This sounds incredibly thrilling, but the difficulty is off the charts! In a place like the U.S. where private property rights are held sacred, doing this would trigger unimaginable legal, political, and economic tsunamis. Sister Alden's warning is not without reason.
'Hash wars' are not alarmist! If major powers really elevate Bitcoin reserves to national security levels, the competition around Bitcoin will not only be about buying but also mining farms and hash power control will intensify, potentially heating up many times more than now.
Insights for retail investors?
Pay attention to major national policy trends! Discussions at this level could cause huge market shocks if there’s any sign of change. Don’t just bury your head in trading; look up and see the road!
'Hash power' value becomes prominent! If the 'hash war' starts, the position of companies and pools with strong hash power will soar.
Is Bitcoin's 'anti-seizure' property being tested? Bitcoin claims to be 'censorship-resistant', but what happens if the government directly seizes companies holding it? This scenario is worth pondering.
State-level actions are a barometer! Paying attention to the implementation of policies in places like Texas could be a precursor to a larger storm.
Big D's summary:
The U.S. 'nationalizing' Bitcoin companies for reserves? Currently, it looks more like an intense thought experiment and strategic debate, highlighting Bitcoin's increasing strategic importance. Actual operations? Full of obstacles and high costs. But Texas's bill and experts' heated debates tell us: Bitcoin is being viewed from a new, more serious perspective, and the curtain on its geopolitical game may have already been lifted!
$BTC
Follow Big D, a professional team will help you hit precise trading points and keep up with the rhythm to let your assets soar! Big D steadily doubles down, low leverage, private contracts.#比特币巨鲸动向
