Do not be aligned with @0xPolygon. Do not be aligned with @A | 0xMarcB on Binance Square

Trending Articles

Bookmarked and Liked

--

Do not be aligned with @0xPolygon. Do not be aligned with @Agglayer. Do not be aligned with @katana. 
Build, create content, explore these ecosystems because they are the best products for your needs. Then, stay on them forever. Expand where you need. Grow your business. Do what you need to be successful. Polygon, Agglayer and Katana will help you along the way.

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.

0

0

Explore the latest crypto news

⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto

💬 Interact with your favorite creators

👍 Enjoy content that interests you

Email / Phone number

Relevant Creator

@0xMarcB

Explore More From Creator

my goal is for users to receive more than $50M from @katana returning bridge yield, sequencer fees, and stablecoins revenue from katana. ⚔️ going to be hard but doable. don’t even ask what i want to see in year 2 and beyond 🤯

--

too often in crypto, we design UX around what’s easiest for protocols—not for users. that has to change. that’s why onboarding to @katana must be easy. web2 users don’t pay to use an app. they don’t think about gas. they don’t even know what “gas” is. if we want to build the future of finance, then we need to meet them where they are—not where crypto started. katana is built for the next generation of apps: consumer-facing, seamless, and fast. if you make it hard for users to onboard, you’ve lost them before they’ve even tried the product. we refuse to build a gated experience. easy onboarding isn’t just a “nice to have.” It’s a strategic necessity: - lower friction = higher adoption - better retention = stronger network effects - more users = more value across the ecosystem we’ve seen it time and again: crypto-native users tolerate friction; mainstream users don’t. katana is built for both users so onboarding needs to feel like tiktok, not a wallet tutorial. easy onboarding is also about respect. it says: “we value your time. se believe you’ll love what we built. and we’ll make it easy to show you.” we’re designing katana with one goal: to make crypto easy. no jargon. no complex signing. just great apps—and an ecosystem that feels like magic. the best UX is no UX. katana’s UX will start good. it’ll become great with more time and feedback. excited to hear from users in a week.

--

people have asked: “why do we need one deep liquidity pool on sushi as the core dex app on katana when dex aggregators can already route across multiple pools?” it’s a good question, but here’s why deep native liquidity still matters.👇 dex aggregators do a great job of finding best execution across fragmented liquidity. but they don’t solve the core problems caused by that fragmentation: – worse pricing due to slippage – poor UX from unpredictable routing – increased MEV risk – more gas costs when you concentrate liquidity into one deep pool, you dramatically reduce slippage—even for large trades. That’s critical for both traders and apps that rely on reliable execution. with fragmented pools, every hop adds cost and risk. aggregators route after price impact has occurred in each pool. they’re reactive. asingle deep pool is proactive—you get better quotes from the start. liquidity depth drives price efficiency. on katana, sushi as the core dex apps is designed to have natively integrated liquidity that’s deep by design. this means: – better execution without needing to aggregate – more predictable pricing – stronger UX for end-users – a foundation composable with everything else built on top it also simplifies design for other apps. instead of worrying about how to route or optimize for various liquidity sources, protocols can just tap into one deep source they trust. in short: DEX aggregators play an important role, especially cross-chain—but they can’t replace the benefits of deep native liquidity in a single pool. katana’s design with sushi as the core dex app focuses on building this foundation natively into the ecosystem. one deep pool = – better capital efficiency – sower slippage – easier integrations – less MEV – better UX fragmented liquidity will always be suboptimal. Aggregators patch, but deep pools solve. this is why i believe in the core app thesis. it’s not just a technical preference—it’s a strategic one. Let’s build the base layer right. This way, users win.

--

when @katana launches on June 30, it'll have an opinionated front end, not just a lazy bridge. What would you hope to see on that front end knowing all you have learned about katana over the last few weeks?

--

The velocity of deposits to @katana has increased with over $135M deposited. But the TVL this represents isn't the important part. It is the split of assets: 💵 over 50% in stablecoins Ξ over 25% in ETH ₿ less than 25% in BTC This split is consistent with the value that each of the assets drives in a DeFi ecosystem. I suspect that at some point a significant amount of BTC will be deposited that throws off this mix but I expect it to be temporary and show interest that attracts even more stablecoins.

--

Latest News

AguilaTrades Increases Bitcoin Holdings Amid Profits

--

Bitcoin Surpasses 108,000 USDT with Daily Increase

--

Bhutan Utilizes Bitcoin Reserves to Offset Tourism Revenue Decline

--

New U.S. Mortgage Rules May Boost Crypto Adoption, Says ARK Invest’s Cathie Wood

--

Macro Outlook: Markets Eye U.S. PMI and Jobs Data as Fed Patience Signals Mount

--

Trending Articles

$BTC pumped after clearing the lower side liquidity and now

DeCrypto TokenTalks

As of today, I can confidently say that even if we have 10 b

Farrah Depetris qTix

THE FINAL BOUNCE BEFORE THE BLOODBATH.

Learn this simplest method of trading cryptocurrencies, and

Square-Creator-14f57d253

XRP Insiders Dump $68M Daily—Smart Money Exit from the Dust

Cookie Preferences

Cookie Preferences