Impact of 'Operation Midnight Hammer' Attack on Iran Triggers Internal Debate in the US

WASHINGTON – The United States' military operation against Iran's nuclear facilities, codenamed "Operation Midnight Hammer," is now sparking a sharp internal debate in Washington. White House officials and intelligence sources are reportedly at odds over the actual level of success of the attack.

Publicly, President Donald Trump claims the attack as a "spectacular military success" that has "totally obliterated" Iran's nuclear program. However, leaks from early intelligence assessments reported by several media outlets present a different picture. According to intelligence sources, although the facilities were severely damaged, the core of Iran's nuclear program is likely not destroyed and has only been set back several months. There are concerns that the underground facilities that were the primary targets may still be intact or that critical uranium stockpiles were moved beforehand.

The White House strongly rejected that assessment, calling it an inaccurate and politically motivated leak to downplay the mission's success.

This dispute arises at a crucial time, as a very fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran is still being sought to be maintained. The uncertainty surrounding the real impact of "Operation Midnight Hammer" could complicate future diplomatic efforts, as the actual level of Iran's nuclear threat is now a subject of debate within the US government itself.