Fetch.ai (FET) continues its recovery period, which dips by more than 7% in terms of volume and low sentiment.
All Inu AI (AI) trades in a uniform range but has a vivid turnover whereas market cap is low.
Render (RNDR) maintains huge losses having broken all the main moving averages with selling pressure.
Crypto markets are still trading under pressure, and investors are actively looking at which tokens could potentially break out. Artificial intelligence and infrastructure-related assets have gained popularity, due to which tokens such as Fetch.ai (FET), Any Inu AI (AI), and Render (RNDR) are now in the limelight. They cover distinct fields in the digital asset market, encompassing everything from AI utility to blockchain rendering, and are facing distinct technical and market issues in the process.
Fetch.ai Continues Its Decline Amid Broad Market Weakness
Fetch.ai (FET) recorded a notable decline on June 22, 2025, falling 7.36% over 24 hours to trade at $0.6015. The asset's market capitalization also fell to $1.44 billion, reflecting a 7.32% loss. This drop occurred alongside a sharp contraction in 24-hour trading volume, which decreased 25.28% to $87.17 million. These conditions highlight a marked reduction in investor activity during the session.
The price chart shows that pressures to sell have been continuing during the trading period, with no technical strengths to show a change of face. FET dropped to the intraday highs of 0.6555, and it maintains that direction as it shows a continued bearish trend. The relatively stable supply of tokens in circulation (2.39 billion out of a limited cap of 2.71 billion) has not offered much confidence to the market.
There is Action of All Inu AI except Structural Constraints
As of June 22, 2025, any Inu AI (AI) is being traded at the price of 0.051959, and it has an insignificant decrease in the last 24 hours of -0.24%.The token's market cap remained unchanged at approximately $824,230, and its fully diluted valuation mirrored this figure, implying that the entire reported token supply of 420.69 billion AI is already in circulation. Daily trading volume saw a 5.74% increase to $139,120, which suggests a modest uptick in transaction activity.
Price movement remains within a very tight band, with minor fluctuations between $0.05195 and $0.05198 over the 24 hours. This limited range is indicative of low liquidity and thin order books, which makes the asset sensitive to small trades. Despite consistent activity, the project shows structural risks, most notably, a lack of public data regarding maximum supply and a profile score of just 49%. These transparency concerns may limit broader investor participation.
Render Token Breaks Down Below Major Support Levels
Render (RNDR) closed at $2.888 on June 21, reflecting a 5.50% intraday loss. This move further confirmed the token’s prevailing downtrend, which has persisted since early May. RNDR has broken beneath all critical moving averages: the 7-day at $3.211, 25-day at $3.672, and 99-day at $3.992. These technical levels are now acting as resistance as the token attempts to stabilize.
Trading volume was relatively strong, with over 8.8 million USDT exchanged during the session, indicating active selling pressure. The asset peaked at over $5.50 in recent months but has since retraced significantly, forming a sequence of lower highs and lower lows. An amplitude reading of 9.16% underlines the day’s heightened volatility. The current order book suggests resistance between $2.90 and $3.00, presenting a near-term challenge for any recovery attempts.
Assessing Potential and Risk in Emerging Crypto Projects
As traders search for the next crypto project with breakout potential, tokens like FET, AI, and RNDR offer diverse profiles in terms of market cap, volatility, and technical outlook. FET, while experiencing declining momentum, remains one of the more established tokens in the AI sector with a high total value and defined supply cap. Any Inu AI presents a different case, offering high token supply and erratic yet persistent trade activity, but with limited visibility on core project fundamentals.
Render, by contrast, belongs to the infrastructure space and shows clear technical patterns. Although it is under heavy downside pressure, past price action and consistent volume keep it on the radar for momentum-driven strategies. Investors seeking to allocate capital in anticipation of the next market surge are likely to monitor not only price action but also volume shifts, resistance levels, and broader ecosystem trends when evaluating these tokens.
