The Lisk ecosystem is facing a pivotal moment as Lisk DAO prepares for a major governance vote scheduled for July 1st. The proposal: whether to burn 100 million LSK tokens currently held in the DAO treasury. If approved, this would immediately reduce the total supply by 25%, dropping from 400 million to 300 million LSK—a move with significant implications for the token’s long-term value and the ecosystem’s funding capabilities.
According to statements posted on Lisk’s official forum, the vote will determine the future of tokens minted during LSK’s migration to the Ethereum network as an ERC-20 asset. With the vote deadline nearing, intense debate has erupted across community channels.
Burn or Build? The Debate Intensifies
The 100 million LSK in question is part of a 145 million token tranche created during Lisk’s transition to Ethereum. While 45 million of these are already set to vest over a three-year period, the remaining 100 million now await a final verdict from the community.
Proponents of the burn argue that reducing token supply will increase scarcity and, by extension, strengthen market confidence. With fewer tokens in circulation, they believe the price per token will have more room to appreciate, helping to position Lisk more competitively within the broader altcoin landscape.
On the other hand, those opposed to the burn warn that permanently removing these funds could cripple the project’s future development. Under the current vesting plan, the 100 million LSK would be released gradually between 2027 and 2033—15 million tokens each year—to support grants, liquidity programs, and ecosystem expansion. Critics of the burn emphasize that the treasury is only used via governance-approved proposals, so fears of unchecked inflation are likely overstated.
Growth vs. Scarcity: A Strategic Crossroads
Should the burn be approved, the impact would be immediate: a 25% cut in total supply. While this could lead to short-term price appreciation, some experts caution that limiting developer incentives and community grants could hurt Lisk’s ability to attract new talent and build out a vibrant dApp ecosystem.
If the proposal is rejected, the tokens will remain under vesting restrictions but could introduce a new set of risks. Gradual releases during weak market cycles might create unwanted selling pressure, affecting token stability. However, future votes could still authorize partial or full burns of the vesting tokens—allowing the DAO to take a more dynamic, hybrid approach.
A Defining Moment for Lisk
The upcoming vote is about more than just numbers. It’s a choice between prioritizing scarcity-driven valuation and preserving the financial runway for long-term innovation. Either path will define how Lisk positions itself in an increasingly competitive blockchain landscape.
As always, The Bit Journal will continue to monitor this evolving story and provide in-depth coverage on developments affecting investors and builders alike.
https://twitter.com/Thebitjournal_
https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-bit-journal/
https://t.me/thebitjournal
Follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn and join our Telegram channel to get instant updates on breaking news!
References
Lisk Official Forum – Proposal to Burn 100 Million LSK
https://research.lisk.comLisk Blog – LSK Token Migration and Treasury Overview
https://lisk.com/blogCoinDesk – DAO Governance and Token Economics
https://www.coindesk.comMessari Crypto – Lisk Project Overview and Supply Metrics
https://messari.io/asset/lisk
Read More: Lisk DAO Eyes Massive Token Burn: 100 Million LSK May Be Removed From Supply">Lisk DAO Eyes Massive Token Burn: 100 Million LSK May Be Removed From Supply
