Someone went over yesterday's boop project with me again, and I just realized that the KOLs in the boop system got on board early at 1m (I was rushing with my dog and not looking at my holdings, but now I feel like I need to pay attention again, so I downloaded gmgn back). People like me who got on at 2m without knowing are actually just liquidity. The bigger problem is that it’s obvious they are not on the same page as the boop platform; once they got on dingeling, they poured in, and construction is impossible.

So from this perspective, bnbchain and eth actually have more advantages in terms of playing 'open strategies' or construction, because players on these two chains are more accustomed to a slow pace; once they buy, they just hope to sleep well, without going back to zero the next day, and they can accept a fivefold increase in a month. I can also accept short-term shakeouts, like how bnbchain just launched alpha's $janitor, and the eth community's $zeus has come back to life in the last couple of days. Recently, avax also has a bit of an open strategy feel to it, with $fomo bringing back some losses.

It's not that sol is bad; I still really love sol. It’s just that sol is really not suitable for using too much of a conspiratorial approach here. The projects that can achieve great results in Solana right now are actually just three types: top consensus, top capital, or top new narratives, corresponding to $labubu, $aura, and $launchcoin, respectively. The last thing these three need is conspiracy, or even if there is conspiracy, it’s not a play where leaders get on board layer by layer. For top consensus, conspiracy destroys consensus; for top capital, conspiracy means a heavy load; for top innovation, at most, I just greet you and say buy or not. Playing sol focuses on smoothness and fluidity; a leader's play that rises in steps is obviously too deliberate.