🔗 Part 10/10: Final Verdict: Is WalletConnect Infrastructure We Can Trust?
Let’s wrap up the WCT series with a clear-eyed answer
Over the last 9 posts, we’ve looked at WalletConnect from every angle:
✅ The tech
✅ The token
✅ The partnerships
✅ The potential
⚠️ And the risks
Now it’s time to ask the big question:
👉 Is this real Web3 infrastructure — or just another overhyped token?
Let’s sum it up 👇
🔧 The Protocol
✅ Already integrated into hundreds of wallets and dApps
✅ Solves a real problem: wallet-to-dApp communication
✅ Multi-chain, open-source, and infrastructure-level
Verdict: A clear yes — it’s already powering Web3.
🪙 The Token ($WCT)
❌ No current utility
❓ No clear roadmap
⚠️ Airdropped, not fairly launched
✅ Potential to become a governance or incentive layer
Verdict: Still speculative — but could evolve with the ecosystem.
👥 The Ecosystem
✅ Major partners (MetaMask, Uniswap, Coinbase Wallet)
✅ Growing integrations across DeFi, NFTs, wallets, DAOs
✅ Aligned with Ethereum Foundation standards (EIP-6963 etc.)
Verdict: Strong momentum and institutional trust.
🧠 The Take
WalletConnect is one of the few Web3 protocols that has scaled before launching a token.
It’s not selling a dream.
It’s delivering utility — today.
But $WCT as a token? That’s a speculative layer on top of a proven protocol.
Trust the infra.
Watch the token — and evaluate based on what utility gets added.
💬 Thanks for following the 10-part series!
Want a deep dive on another protocol or token?
Tell me in the comments 👇
