The heat is rising in the Solana ecosystem — and **Jupiter's DAO governance is at the center of the storm**. An anonymous whistleblower, *Thisisfun*, has sparked a major debate over **team influence in community votes**, and the numbers are raising eyebrows 👀🔥
Here’s the breakdown:
• The Jupiter team holds **20% of the total JUP supply**
• In a recent vote, **a single team wallet controlled 4.5%** of the total voting power
• Back in March, the team approved **220 million JUP** in bonuses — from **community reserves**
And yes — those tokens are *locked*, but they’re still **eligible to vote**.
So the big question is: *Is this decentralized governance or controlled consensus?*
Co-founder **Ming Ng** responded, saying two founders will abstain from voting — but a **third, anonymous founder still holds power**. That doesn’t exactly scream transparency.
This controversy hits right at the core of what DAOs are supposed to stand for:
Community > Control
Transparency > Influence
Participation > Power grabs
📌 The crypto world is watching.
Because if one of Solana’s top DEX platforms can be swayed from within — what does that mean for the rest of DeFi?
DAO or no?
Vote or veto?
The line is getting
blurry. Stay alert. 🧠⚠️
#BinanceAlphaAlert #MarketRebound #SaylorBTCPurchase #IsraelIranConflict #MetaplanetBTCPurchase
