📌【Regarding $AB President's 'Clarification' Statement】

Recently, the $AB project gained popularity due to a board photo and the participation of former leaders from multiple countries, and it was also rumored that the 'President's post' was 'false advertising' or 'a clarification slap in the face'. I carefully read the original text and would like to share a few rational interpretations:

The first charitable donation has been completed, with the beneficiaries being impoverished children in East Timor.

The President awarded an honorary certificate for this, expressing appreciation.

❌ Therefore, this statement does not deny the relationship, but is rather an 'official explanation + expected cooling', emphasizing that it is 'still in the early stages and has been initiated'.

🎯 My viewpoint is:

With celebrities participating, a record of donations, and a global narrative, these are all real positive signals.

However, charity and token value cannot be equated, especially at this current stage where the project is still primarily focused on 'narrative + vision' and lacks a complete closed loop.

Whether to invest or not, the core still depends on these three points: 'token model, team execution capability, technical implementation ability'.

💡 Question:

Can $AB continue to lose alpha and still protect the President's rights?