The crypto world is never short of excitement, but behind the excitement often lie bloody lessons. The collapse of ZKJ and KOGE was like a carefully designed harvesting, with a 90% evaporation of market value, LPs losing their capital, and contract liquidations triggering in a chain, allowing countless people to experience what it means to 'have their principal reduced to zero' in just a few hours. The problem with such projects is very straightforward - there is no real support, relying purely on liquidity brushing and emotional speculation; once large funds withdraw and sell off, prices drop directly into a vacuum zone, with no chance to escape.
But the Alpha strategy itself is not wrong; the mistake lies in choosing the wrong target. After the collapse of ZKJ and KOGE, the market needs a project that can withstand pressure and is genuinely reliable, and MYX has proven its value with data - unafraid of the storm, consistently in the top five for trading volume, normal price fluctuations, and solid pool depth. This is not a coincidence, but a result of the studio and users voting with their feet. In other words, while other projects are still playing the 'run fast' game, MYX has already become the most stable choice for brushing Alpha; just follow blindly!
Why can MYX withstand market pressure?
First of all, MYX is not an air coin. It has real product support, a clear team background, and has already established a foothold in its market segment. In contrast, ZKJ and KOGE have almost no substantial business support aside from trading volume and liquidity; their collapse is just a matter of time. MYX's underlying logic is completely different - its pool depth and market capitalization match reasonably, without excessive leverage or false liquidity, and its price stability is far higher than similar projects.
Secondly, MYX's wear is extremely low. After three rounds of quantitative testing, the wear on the principal from brushing volume is negligible, which means that the cost-effectiveness of brushing Alpha long-term is extremely high. Many projects offer exaggerated incentives short-term to attract traffic, but once funds are withdrawn, wear will spike drastically, even directly consuming the principal. MYX's design clearly focuses more on sustainability rather than short-term speculation.
Finally, MYX has a low circulating market value, but its pool is thick enough. This combination means significant upward price potential, but it's extremely difficult to crash the price downward. For Alpha strategies, this kind of target is almost perfect - it can both stabilize volume brushing and ambush potential gains. In contrast, while ZKJ and KOGE's pools are deep, they completely rely on brushing; once large funds withdraw, liquidity is instantly exhausted, and the price directly crashes.
The studio and users have made their choice.
After the collapse of ZKJ and KOGE, many similar projects began desperately packaging new gimmicks in an attempt to attract traffic. But players who have truly experienced a collapse understand that flashy stories are not as good as solid fundamentals. MYX did not follow the hype; instead, it won market trust through real products and stable liquidity.
Data doesn't lie - after the storms of KOGE and ZKJ, MYX's trading volume has remained stable in the top five, precisely because both the studio and users are voting with real money. For Alpha strategies, the most important thing is not short-term explosiveness, but long-term stability. MYX's low wear, thick pool, and stable coin price make it one of the few targets in the market that can balance volume brushing and principal safety.
If you are still struggling to choose which project to brush Alpha, why not take a look at the market's choices? The lessons from ZKJ and KOGE have been profound enough; don't give money to air tokens anymore. MYX's pool, wear and fundamentals have already proven that it is currently the most reliable Alpha target. Blindly following? Perhaps that is the smartest choice.
