The current alpha is not just a simple trading score, it's a bit of a play on human nature. In the early stage, studios acted as shields, right? But now? It's purely playing with psychology. I hope those destined can pay attention to this post.

First, is alpha really related to studios?

This question is quite profound. Let's make an assumption: if there were no studios, would the threshold increase? From a human nature perspective, without studios, the threshold would indeed increase. The process of increase should be what we are seeing now; the golden period has passed, and it’s time to harvest. Now, regarding the second question about studios: without studios, would profits increase? Fantasizing is useless; current data proves everything—100-80-70-60-50-40. Even without studios, profits will still continue to decline.

Second, regarding the projects launched after going online, have they really passed all assessments?

Currently, the projects launched in alpha can no longer be described as trash. Even the growth team's donkey wouldn't dare to crash the market like this, but the projects selected by alpha have done it, repeatedly refreshing the bottom line. When they fall, it’s extremely non-standard and very willful! The bottom line for K charts is not the project's bottom line; falling 2 times in one day, 4 times in two days, comparable to playing contracts! Alpha’s strict selection, whoever buys gets hurt.

Currently, the two issues faced by alpha’s strict selection are that studios are no longer the scapegoats, and the standards for listing coins are now filled with doubts. If airdrops turn into a game of running fast, what is the point of listing coins? Theoretically, one cannot have both fish and bear’s paw, but let’s not just give up hope. I don’t have any good suggestions; after all, as a retail investor, I can only make a bit of money. I just hope that at least one side turns out well.