In recent years, Bitcoin has become not just an asset for private investors but also a topic of strategic discussions at the state level. Some countries (for example, El Salvador) have already included $BTC in their reserves. But can such an idea work for superpowers like the USA?
Let's consider: #TrumpBTCTreasury
✅ Pros of creating a state reserve in Bitcoins:
1. Diversification of Reserves
Bitcoin is not dependent on the political decisions of the Fed, ECB, or IMF. This makes it a potentially useful element of a diversified reserve, especially in an era of increasing geopolitical instability.
2. Protection Against Inflation and Issuance of Fiat Currencies
Bitcoin has a limited issuance (maximum of 21 million), unlike the dollar or euro. In conditions of inflation, BTC can serve as "digital gold."
3. Long-term Value Growth
Since 2009, Bitcoin has shown outstanding growth dynamics. Reserves formed based on it can theoretically multiply — especially over a 10+ year perspective.
4. Geopolitical Independence
If a country faces sanctions or restrictions on access to global reserves (like Russia), BTC can become a tool to bypass traditional financial barriers.
❌ Cons and Risks:
1. High Volatility
Bitcoin can drop by 50–70% in just a few months. For a state reserve, such instability poses a huge financial risk.
2. Lack of Regulation and Legal Protection
State assets should be protected by law. But Bitcoin has still not been recognized as a universal asset, and its status may vary from country to country.
3. Threat of Cyber Attacks and Loss of Access
If a country loses private keys to wallets — assets are lost forever. In the context of cyber wars, this is especially relevant.
4. Political Unpopularity
Investing public money in "digital speculation" may provoke public discontent — especially during a price drop.
🔍 Conclusion: Should the USA form a Bitcoin reserve?
The USA has the most powerful reserves in the world (gold, dollars, government bonds). With their economic position, there is no need to follow El Salvador's path. However, partial inclusion of #BTC — within 1–2% of strategic assets — may be a justified step, especially considering the growing role of digital assets in the global economy.
Thus, a full-fledged BTC reserve in #USA is currently impractical, but as a tool for diversification and technological adaptation — it certainly has a right to exist.