Abstract vs. Uniswap vs. Magic Eden - No hype. Just behavior.

After my last post, my friend @Aizcalibur asked:

"How does Abstract compare to something like Uniswap’s app interface or a wallet extension?" - fair question.

So I pulled data from two sources: Similarweb & Semrush

Then I compared three of the most-used Web3 portals:

> @AbstractChain

> @Uniswap

> @MagicEden

And while the numbers don’t fully align across tools.

One signal stayed consistent 👇

(1/)

🕒 Average Session Duration

(Similarweb / Semrush)

• Abstract – 8:49 / 10:45

• Uniswap – 4:26 / 9:37

• Magic Eden – 4:14 / 8:34

↩️ Bounce Rate

• Abstract – 28.8% / 38.0%

• Magic Eden – 42.6% / 43.7%

• Uniswap – 44.0% / 52.4%

📄 Pages per Visit differed slightly by source but Abstract consistently ranked in the top 2 across both.

(2/)

What does that tell us?

Even with variations between analytics tools, one thing holds:

Abstract users:

✅ Spend more time on-site

✅ Explore more content

✅ Leave less frequently

And remember that Abstract has only been launched for 5 months, compared to ME's 4 years and Uniswap's 7 years

That’s not anecdotal. That’s behavior.

And in Web3, where most dashboards are built to farm wallets and fake metrics.

Engagement like this stands out.

In Web3, clicks can be noise.

Exploration is signal.