MAVIA, AERO, HOME: Three-pronged attack, which side do you stand on?

Among the new cryptocurrency elites, MAVIA, AERO, and HOME are like three major factions, each with its own style, all vying for narrative dominance.

MAVIA focuses on Web3 gaming, backed by content as traffic, where players embody consensus. Even in a bear market, it can sustain itself through in-game circulation, while a bull market acts as an accelerator with strong rallying capability.

AERO is speeding on the L2 track, concentrating on liquidity and DApp ecosystem layout, resembling a breeding ground for yield farmers plus an institutional traffic pool. Its technical narrative is hardcore, capital enters quickly, and when it rallies, it can be quite vigorous.

HOME takes a different approach, focusing on the tokenization of real estate, putting "bricks" on-chain. Its asset-side narrative is innovative, suitable for the conservative, but limited by traditional market regulations and conversion efficiency.

In summary: MAVIA relies on users, AERO on technology, and HOME on the asset side. In a bull market, MAVIA may lead the way, AERO may catch up, and HOME will steadily progress. Which one to choose? It depends on your heartbeat.