Phần 2

1. There are many analysis methods (TA, FA, on-chain, sentiment, etc.), but in each market phase, only a few methods align with the "big waves" → the rest will be out of phase → losing money.

2. Market makers intentionally maintain a conflict loop between different schools of thought to ensure:

Each year, there are at least a few rounds of "sweeping out" followers of each misguided school.

No one is allowed to win continuously → creating an "illusion of winning and losing in cycles" → keeping players engaged.

3. Many people from other markets (real estate, gold, stocks) bring their old mindset → wrong context → lose → unwilling to accept change.

4. The crypto community is often divided by analysis schools, leading to:

Mocking each other when one loses – the other wins.

Not learning from each other, not upgrading methods → easily falling back into the old loop.

5. The reason why "outdated, unsuitable" methods still exist:

Because the market needs to maintain a diversity of schools → diverse capital flows → creating exploitation opportunities (from the market makers).

🧠 Further analysis of each point:

🧩 1. Big waves only support 1-2 schools at each stage

For example:

Downtrend market → those following on-chain and sentiment easily make mistakes → only FA or long-term TA maintain their view.

During the "accumulation" phase of whales → on-chain data is very murky → those only following capital flow (volume, OI, funding) are easily trapped.

➡️ Therefore, if you insist on sticking to a single school, but it is out of sync → you will continuously lose without understanding why.