🌐

UN & IAEA:
UN Secretary-General António Guterres and IAEA Chief Rafael Grossi both urged for “maximum restraint,” warning that attacks on nuclear infrastructure risk blowing the situation out of diplomatic channels tribune.com.pk+2reuters.com+2indiatimes.com+2indiatimes.com.

United States & NATO:
The U.S. affirmed it wasn’t involved and emphasized support for de-escalation, urging Iran to avoid attacks on American interests. NATO echoed this sentiment, emphasizing diplomatic solutions and cautionen.wikipedia.org+3reuters.com+3indiatimes.com+3.

Regional Powers:
Turkey, Oman, Jordan, and Gulf states (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE) condemned the strikes as violations of international law and urged immediate restraint indiatimes.com. Israel responded by taking emergency measures, including closing embassies and upgrading air defenses .

Major Powers:
Russia labeled the attack “unprovoked and unacceptable,” while China expressed deep concern and called for de-escalation apnews.com+1economictimes.indiatimes.com+1. The EU, UK, France, and Germany also condemned the strike and strongly urged diplomatic efforts .

⚠️ Economic & Security Ripple Effects

Oil Markets: Crude prices surged over 6–7% on fears of supply disruptions at the Strait of Hormuz .

Financial Markets: Global equities dipped, while safe-haven assets such as gold and U.S. treasuries saw inflows .

Cybersecurity: Heightened military action increases the risk of related cyber operations targeting infrastructure and financial systems.

Refugee Risk & Humanitarian Concerns: Heightened troop alertness and potential displacement in adjacent regions, although full-scale civilian migration hasn’t been reported yet.

  • 🛑 Bottom Line

The global consensus is clear: this is a serious regional escalation requiring immediate diplomatic engagement. Moving forward hinges on Iran’s response, regional mediation efforts, and the ability of international players to de-escalate tensions before they spiral into broader conflict.