As a holder of BNB, I will definitely speak up for BNB. However, if you at Binance do not want to empower BNB on Alpha, that's fine. At least change the rules for the holding score so that stablecoins do not count towards the holding score. This way, those studio accounts that only have 1000 USDT to boost their scores will lose 30 points in one cycle. This would effectively strike at the studios. Real users definitely cannot be fully invested in USDT; only those who buy cryptocurrencies and hold them are the true members of the crypto community and the customers of CEX.

The patina images are sourced from the internet and are clearly from a studio operating under alpha rules. Currently, the alpha rule is based on trading volume, so the studio has no concerns at all. Just keep USDT in the account; they are not afraid of transaction fees as long as the score is high enough to claim the airdrop. For them, it's a no-risk, high-reward situation, and then they can continue to increase their positions indefinitely. It is strongly recommended to raise the holding requirement for 93853868351. Other studios can open accounts indefinitely and spread USDT across different accounts to exploit your Binance platform, resulting in not even needing BNB. If you were to enforce a requirement to hold BNB, studios would no longer recklessly increase their positions. Currently, the scores are really being manipulated by studios to the point where normal traders who trade and hodl, contributing transaction fees to your Binance CEX, are being overshadowed by studios that deposit 1000 USDT, claim airdrops, and then dump in bulk before withdrawing U. They are leeching off the project parties providing airdrops and off Binance CEX.