In the past few weeks, I've followed everyone who interacted with me frequently; I shouldn't have missed anyone, right?

I believe that friends who interact frequently are the ones most worth following. I just realized this recently!

I follow people very casually:

I don't look at follower counts. Even if someone with tens of millions of followers follows me, I feel deep down that they are a scam artist harvesting followers, and I absolutely won't follow them back.

I don't form cliques. I am an independent person who doesn't like to associate with others, often tweeting and criticizing people. If some interest groups have shady dealings that I criticize, it would be too troublesome to unfollow them. Sometimes, I don't unfollow; I just hide them to avoid hurting their fragile feelings.

I don't engage in low-quality mutual follows. I think for new Twitter users, there’s no problem with mutual follows for the first 500. But mutual follows are the least sticky and most useless. People who you connect with through mutual follows will basically not interact with you.

Besides the frequently interacting friends, I have recently followed two types of people: one type is @SuccinctLabs deep participants; these people are quite fierce, and the project's DC and Twitter popularity are supported by them, making it feel like dozens of people have created a community of thousands!

The other type is @PlayWildcard deep participants; these individuals are even fiercer, daring to jump in early to grab cards, and in the mid-stage, they invest heavily to acquire chips. The key is that we are approaching the late stage, and one by one, they are pushing their luck to wake up countless nights and early mornings to grab chips. I have no choice but to keep competing with them.

Among these three types of people, if I missed anyone, @Greta0086, I will follow you; I shouldn't have missed too many.