MASK Data Sharing: Currently, the main force is flowing out at all levels, with an outflow of 6M in one hour. We believe that it's not an issue to short lightly near the previous high points of the stop-loss range. This message has not formed a strategy, and the fees can likely be judged as retail investors in the infant and toddler sector going long. The subsequent trend should mainly be a downward slide, referencing the trends of layer and wct. We assess that the income from short positions is likely to exceed the expenditure on fees, and it will be difficult to see a significant rebound afterward.

The cost of MASK is ridiculously high now 🤣, the tricks of the counterfeiters have changed again. Previously, they raised the price and then used high costs to force shorts to cut losses at high levels, but recently the trick has changed to directly slashing the price down and using high costs to deceive retail investors into going long, exactly like the WCT's tactics. In the end, the decline will exceed the income from long positions 🤣. However, the shorts themselves are holding onto costs while facing a decline, and once the longs are cleared, there might be a sudden surge to clear the shorts at any time. Overall, though, the risk factor for long positions is greater because the probability of making a profit at this price is very low, and the entry rate for retail long positions far exceeds that of shorts. The costs are most likely a trap to lure more longs, and if it really drops, the counterfeiters have no bottom. It's becoming increasingly difficult for retail investors 🤣.