Legal Setback for $TRUMP in Harvard Battle

šŸ›ļø What Happened

A U.S. federal judge in Boston, Allison Burroughs, has temporarily blocked President Donald Trump’s recent executive proclamation that would have barred international students from entering the U.S. to study at Harvard University .

🧾 Court's Reasoning

The judge ruled that forcing Harvard to exclude foreign students could cause ā€œimmediate and irreparable injuryā€ .

This decision extends an earlier restraining order that had already thwarted the administration's attempt to revoke Harvard’s ability to sponsor international visas .

šŸ” Legal Basis

Harvard argued the proclamation lacked credible national security evidence, violated the First Amendment, and constituted retaliation against the university for resisting government demands .

International students make up around 25–27% of Harvard’s enrollment .

šŸ“Œ Broader Context & Stakes

This move follows several measures by Trump’s administration targeting Harvard:

Freezing $2–3 billion in research grants

Attempts to revoke federal funding and tax-exempt status

Demands for ideological oversight of curriculum

Experts warn that despite courtroom wins for Harvard, the administration’s control over visas and funding could still undermine the university’s operations .

ā³ What’s Next

The current restraining order remains effective until at least June 20, with further hearings scheduled soon .

Harvard is preparing legal strategies and contingency plans to protect its international student body and research funding .

---

šŸ”® Why This Matters

A big win for academic freedom and university autonomy—Harvard pushes back against political pressure.

Sets a precedent for other universities facing similar threats.

Indicates a broader legal pushback on Trump-era immigration and education policies.

#MyCOSTrade #TrumpVsMusk #MarketPullback #CircleIPO #CUDISBinanceTGE $BERA $DOGE