I just helped her earn on Solv once, and she ended up earning 1760U.
At first, I did have some thoughts, considering she asks me every day, "Teacher, is there still an opportunity for BTC airdrop?～"
I said, "Yes, Solv is working on a prize pool."
She said, "Then help me earn one first, I want to see the process."
I hesitated for a moment and gave her my frequently used small account address.
She said, "Why does your address only have 6U?"
I smiled and explained, "That's rbTC, I've already earned several rounds."
She said, "Oh, then I want to earn from 0 to the step of circular staking with solvBTC."
So we went from the first pool to the fourth pool, turning task vouchers from a few votes to 66 votes.
Every time after the BRO binding, she would say, "Can we do it again?"
I said, "If you keep earning like this, you'll be the queen of the debt pool!"
She said, "I want to try dual addresses + dual signature binding."
That night, I couldn't help myself and opened 10 wallets for her in one go.
The next day, she posted on her social media:
"Thanks to the Solv mentor, I earned 1760U in one night, BTC really has passive income ❤️"
✅ What she earned isn't me, it's the new financial structure on the BTC chain:
Solv × Binance On-Chain Yield collaboration
BTC staking without selling coins, annualized 3.9%, on-chain settlement
Prize pool airdrop is transparent and public, task vouchers exchanged for dividends
✅ Real profits are not just orders, but governance binding:
Complete interaction → BRO signature → Obtain RWA bond pool voting rights
What she earned is structural income, while I am just earning task vouchers.
She obtained future income rights, while I am still brushing "daily cycles."
🎯 Until that day, I finally understood what she meant by "I don't do scripts":
She doesn't not do it; she is already drafting a new proposal on the governance page.
The title reads:
"Proposal to remove proxy multi-address earning accounts to protect the rights of real participants."
Someone in the comments asked her: "Why are you being so radical?"
She replied with three words: "It needs to be clean."
