If you were given 1,800 BTC, how would you spend it?

In early January, an “1800 BTC pledge” incident that shocked the entire blockchain community quietly exploded.

A "chain celebrity" claimed to have pledged 1,800 BTC for the Solv platform, causing an uproar on the entire network. However, this seemingly stunning operation eventually turned into a drama about "fake TVL", "profit distribution", "airdrop betting" and "public opinion backlash".

This is not only a chain pledge storm, but more like a magic mirror that reveals the true structure of the project.

Phase 1: Thunderous applause, the emergence of the "chain heroine"

When the news came out that she had pledged 1,800 BTC, everyone was shocked.

🪙“If she didn’t have strong confidence in Solv, how could she have bet 1,800 BTC?”

🌊The community was in an uproar, and major KOLs reposted and expressed their support, saying that this was a great endorsement of the Solv project.

At that time, no one thought that the 1,800 BTC was not all hers. According to later information, she had "pulled a large investor to place a joint order", which made a shocking news.

The second stage: Public opinion reverses, and rights protection posters emerge

Soon, things took a turn.

In a rights protection poster, she angrily accused Solv of "reducing the airdrop" and "the project owner was dishonest", which instantly aroused the sympathy of retail investors: "1,800 BTC is not worthy of the airdrop? Is the project running away?"

The community was boiling again, and many people rushed to Solv’s official TG and X platforms to question it, and some even shouted: “Give the airdrop back!”

Phase 3: The truth comes to light and the fight against fakes begins

But a few hours later, another whistleblower spoke out:

“Her BTC is not staked at all, it just generates fake TVL. This is a leftover trick from Merlin.”

It turns out that the so-called “pledge” did not involve any actual transfer of funds. Instead, it simply posted an mBTC through a custodial account and falsified the data—an act of TVL fraud.

When distributing airdrops this time, Solv decisively cut off this part of fake TVL and distributed more airdrops to users who actually pledged real money.

At this point, public opinion began to split:

💥On one side are the big players + her "rights defenders", saying that the platform is not trustworthy

🔥On one side are retail investors + observers who think that the project owner is doing the right thing and should not condone the "capital players" who are trying to take advantage of the airdrops

Phase 4: The dust has settled, real users benefit, and the project landscape is revealed

After multiple verifications, Solv officially clarified the data:

All users who actually participated in staking and deposited assets across chains received the corresponding airdrop rewards.

The "fake pledge" of 1,800 BTC was not only not recognized by the project owner, but even the airdrop snapshot mechanism was not activated. In other words, the 1,800 BTC did not provide any real liquidity support for the Solv ecosystem.

Even more outrageous is——

She also tried to use this incident to issue her own tokens, under the banner of "being bullied", packaging herself as a "victim", and began to raise funds. All these operations can't help but remind people of her past history of "giving out local dogs and harvesting".

KOL Ni Da hit the nail on the head: "She doesn't care about her dignity anymore."

Solv has demonstrated with actions that real DeFi benefits users, not capital players

Solv did not choose to "kneel down and lick the big players", but chose to protect those who truly participate, truly stake, and truly contribute to the ecosystem.

All of this has led more and more people to re-recognize Solv:

🔹 Binance Earn exclusive partner, BTC strategy annualized income can reach up to 3.9%

🔹 Join forces with Solana to release $3 billion in BTC liquidity and connect Wall Street RWA cash flow

🔹 Cooperate with BlackRock Fund to connect Bitcoin to real income

🔹 Launched SolvBTC, xSolvBTC, SolvBTC.BNB and other income products

Conclusion: You have 1,800 BTC, do you want to take advantage of the airdrop or build for the future?

The moral of this story:

🔍 A project with real vision is one that dares to abandon "false fire" data and focuses on serving real users.

💡 Users who really want to make money should not be tempted by short-term airdrops, but should focus on long-term value.

Don't let 1800 BTC become a joke. Next time, please stand on the right side. #BTC赛道龙头Solv进军RWA