Once again, I confirm that I did not call for Audi. If you don't understand, you can retake the Chinese language course.

On May Day, I took a trip to Macau, and the place there no longer plays the game; regardless of your chip size, it's just a cut. The main reason is that the foot traffic is huge, with each tourist contributing one or two thousand, which is equivalent to experiencing the game. I remember that in the past, they would play tricks, like arranging a beautiful dealer with a stack of chips, using a long line to catch big fish, letting you win a few rounds first, and then slowly making you lose everything. Now, regardless of your chip size, they just let you lose. When I saw this scene, I suddenly thought of the cryptocurrency world. Aren't the current altcoins just like this? No matter how much capital you have, if you buy, you're already making a profit. Various coins are unlocking, selling, and some are even secretly unlocking. Not to mention those cross-chain coins, which actually double secretly. Here's a simple example: a coin ranked in the top twenty by market cap originally issued on ETH, then issued hundreds of billions on Tron, and then on other chains, also issuing hundreds of billions. By the time everyone is trading or transferring across chains, it uses the already issued coins to pay everyone back. I found that many coins operate this way. Except for those like $ORDI $1000SATS , which has a total supply of only 21 million. The entire cryptocurrency community should reach a consensus to firmly prevent the entry of cross-chain coins with increased issuance into the market. We need to let these projects that rely on issuing tokens to raise money completely die. Also, our Binance platform, as a leader, should do a better job in basic infrastructure, directly launching on-chain tracking functions. I would be willing to pay you a little money every month!