Loudio is speed-running the obvious logical conclusion of the current state of socialfi / infofi.

That for some companies, the product matters less than the hype, attention, the noise - how loud people can be.

(and I know I might get socially slashed for sharing these thoughts)

But the more desperate a team is for attention, the more likely they are to pay for it.

Therefore it's logical to conclude that it's an inverse signal at this point, the opposite of the desired effect (paid leaderboards, paid shilling, etc..) - and not positive sum.

There is the potential to turn this into something that *is* positive sum if true quality, value, reputation was also tied to the companies / software / projects themselves.

And if the user's reputation was also weighed, and affected, by their participation in certain campaigns.

We could see the valuable companies rise to the top, and finally have a public and (more) accurate way to distill what's real, legitimate, high potential, etc... vs what isn't, what's a scam, etc...

Obviously a huge problem in crypto, and a challenge for most people - investors, job seekers, community members, etc...

This is obviously much harder to accomplish, but this is something I'm (and my team) are thinking deeply about and think verifiability plays a big role in the end (or a much higher quality) solution.