This round of meme wave in the cycle, I believe everyone is familiar with. But as it has developed to now, you will find an interesting phenomenon: most people's interest and discussion about 'Zhuang Learning' far exceed that of meme narratives, Dev backgrounds, and other aspects.
This phenomenon can be referred to as the 'Ambiguity Preference Effect': the more ambiguous and unclear things are, the more meaning and attraction people tend to attribute to them. This is particularly common in speculative markets.
Looking back at the entire history of the industry, from the ideal of decentralization, to the narrative of resisting traditional finance, to various 'high-end' terms, and now to the current 'Zhuang Learning'. All reflect this effect.
But let me ask: Does 'Zhuang Learning' really exist? Why does 'Zhuang Learning' appear? How much help does 'Zhuang Learning' provide?
Many people actually cannot answer accurately. Most people subconsciously believe that Zhuang must exist, and wherever there is Zhuang, there is opportunity, because Zhuang will definitely manipulate the market, so I need to find Zhuang and then follow Zhuang to benefit.
As a result, a large number of teachings on finding Zhuang have emerged in the market. But is 'Zhuang' really that easy to find? Is every Zhuang truly powerful?
If we step out of the previous perspective and think about the following questions from the so-called 'Zhuang's' perspective.
How to attract more liquidity buying? What aspects can we leave some 'hooks'?
Considering these questions, is there a possibility?
'The existence of Zhuang' is a hook that Zhuang intentionally exposes, creating a psychological state of desire among retail investors, thereby continuously attracting everyone to participate in the hype of memes.
Moreover, Zhuang actually comes in various levels; a low-level Zhuang might be a friend in your group, a mid-level Zhuang might be a broke trader, while a high-level Zhuang is a wealthy and skilled trader.
Wealthy and skilled Zhuang often can make it difficult for everyone to capture their on-chain traces, but for retail investors, not being able to discover them is akin to 'having no Zhuang', resulting in very few people participating in this asset.
So, appropriately revealing a flaw and creating an illusion of uncertainty, while raising expectations to the highest. Could this solve the above issues?
So, what you think you know may not be what you think. You believe your ability to find Zhuang is strong, but little do you know that it is merely a strand of fantasy intentionally left for you.
To excel in something, you must see through its essence and not always be deceived by the atmosphere and words of the outside world.
Instead of being obsessed with finding Zhuang, it’s better to first clarify which category of narrative logic this meme belongs to. Is it emotional? Ideological? Or purely for fun? Which type is more suitable for igniting the market?
