๐’๐ฎ๐ข ๐๐š๐œ๐ค๐ฌ ๐‚๐ž๐ญ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐”๐ฉ๐ ๐ซ๐š๐๐žโ€”๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ƒ๐ž๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐๐ฌ ๐…๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐”๐ฌ๐ž๐ซ ๐‚๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ž๐ง๐ฌ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง

โœ… Sui has officially supported Cetusโ€™s proposal to upgrade its protocol and unlock frozen customer fundsโ€”but with two major conditions.

๐–๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐‡๐š๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ž๐ง๐ž๐?

Cetus initiated a community vote to change its protocol, aiming to return frozen funds without reversing on-chain history or transactions. The move was triggered by urgent customer fund risks.

๐’๐ฎ๐ขโ€™๐ฌ ๐‘๐ž๐ฌ๐ฉ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ž:

โžก๏ธ Supports the voting process in principle

โžก๏ธ Gives up all official voting rights to remain neutral

โžก๏ธ Will provide the technical framework for fair, transparent voting

โžก๏ธ Demands Cetus commit to using all available resources to fully compensate affected users

๐–๐ก๐ฒ ๐ˆ๐ญ ๐Œ๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ:

This approach preserves the integrity of Suiโ€™s on-chain history while letting the community decideโ€”but puts full pressure on Cetus to deliver restitution without delay.

Sui emphasized:

"Our role is to build processes that reflect the collective willโ€”not influence it."

Bottom Line:

Sui is balancing decentralized governance with user protection, placing the burden of recovery on Cetus while letting the community lead the decision-making.

Next step: All eyes on the voteโ€”and Cetusโ€™s response.

#sui